Facebook investors want to take Zuckerberg down

maisa555 By maisa555, 28th Jun 2018 | Follow this author | RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/93uyeou7/
Posted in Wikinut>Business>Investment

“We believe that our capital structure is in the best interests of our stockholders and that our current corporate governance structure is sound and effective,” the company wrote in a statement, adding that removing Zuckerberg as chairman would cause “uncertainty, confusion, and inefficiency in board and management function.”

Facebook investors want to take Zuckerberg down

After widespread criticism of Facebook’s handling of election meddling, fake news and the Cambridge Analytica scandal, investors are growing increasingly frustrated at the company’s leadership.

Now, some are openly calling for Zuckerberg to scale back his role in the company he created.

Business Insider recently interviewed six prominent independent Facebook investors who control a total of $3 billion in stock and “are trying to topple Mark Zuckerberg as chairman and tear up the company’s governance structure.”

One main point of contention is the way the company’s stock system is set up. Facebook uses a dual-class stock structure in which each class is valued the same monetarily but weighted differently in voting power. Facebook’s Class B stock has 10 times more voting power than the other.

Zuckerberg, who’s chairman and CEO of Facebook, controls more than 75 percent of Facebook’s Class B stock. This gives him nearly unchecked power over the company, enabling him to shoot down shareholder proposals, veto mergers, and vote directors on and off the board .

At Facebook’s annual shareholders meeting in May, James McRitchie, a shareholder activist, said the company was at risk of becoming a “corporate dictatorship.”“Mr Zuckerberg, take a page from history,” he said. “Emulate George Washington, not Vladimir Putin.”

Another investor was forced to leave the room for shouting that “shareholder democracy is lacking at Facebook.”

Independent investors have called for Zuckerberg to step down as chairman and for Facebook to dissolve its dual-class stock structure. Neither have happened.

It’s unclear what the long-term consequences would be if Zuckerberg stepped down from one of his roles. Companies like Apple, Google, Oracle, Twitter, and Microsoft have all decided to separate the roles of CEO and chairman, as Jonas Kron, a senior vice president at Trillium Asset Management, told Business Insider.

A 2012 study from the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation found that companies typically spend more when one person acts as CEO and chairman. The study authors also noted that combining the roles results in an inherent conflict of interest and “appears to be indicative of the potential for other governance and management failures.”

But that’s not how Facebook sees it.

“We believe that our capital structure is in the best interests of our stockholders and that our current corporate governance structure is sound and effective,” the company wrote in a statement, adding that removing Zuckerberg as chairman would cause “uncertainty, confusion, and inefficiency in board and management function.”

Tags

Bussnes, Facebook, Social Media

Meet the author

author avatar maisa555
I graduated from the State University

Share this page

moderator Peter B. Giblett moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know

Comments

Add a comment
Username
Can't login?
Password